Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Nach v. Baldwin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


March 20, 2008

MARVIN W. NACH, DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF PEET'S COFFEE & TEA, INC., PLAINTIFF,
v.
GERALD BALDWIN, HILARY BILLINGS, GORDON A. BOWKER, MICHAEL CLOUTIER, JAMES E. GRIMES, H. WILLIAM JESSE, WILLIAM M. LILLA, BRUCE A. MACLAREN, DEBORAH MCGRAW, PETER B. MEHRBERG, CHRISTOPHER P. MOTTERN, PATRICK O'DEA, JAMES A. REYNOLDS, MARK N. RUDOLPH, JEAN-MICHEL VALETTE, WILLIAM D. WELSH, DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge

[PROPOSED]ORDER REGARDING FED.R. CIV. P. 11(B) COMPLIANCE PEET'S COFFEE & TEA, INC., Nominal Defendant.

Good cause appearing, and pursuant to Section 27(D)(c)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Court hereby finds that Plaintiff, Plaintiff's counsel, Defendants, and Defendants' counsel have complied with each requirement of Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to every complaint, responsive pleading, and dispositive motion in this matter.

The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20080320

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.