UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
April 2, 2008
SAIGUT S.A. DE C.V., A MEXICAN CORPORATION; AND SAIPEM S.A., A FRENCH CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS,
SEMPRA ENERGY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; SEMPRA LNG, A DELAWARE CORPORATION; ENERGIA COSTA AZUL, S. DE R.L., DE C.V., JUDGE: JEFFREY T. MILLER A MEXICAN CORPORATION; BVT LNG COSTA AZUL, S. DE R.L. DE C.V., A MEXICAN CORPORATION; COSTA AZUL BMVT, S.A. DE C.V., A MEXICAN CORPORATION; BLACK & VEATCH CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION; TECHINT S.A. DE C.V., A MEXICAN CORPORATION; THE KLEINFELDER GROUP, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; ARUP NORTH AMERICA LIMITED, A UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION; ARUP TEXAS, INC., A TEXAS CORPORATION; WHESSOE OIL & GAS LIMITED, A UNITED KINGDOM CORPORATION; Q&S ENGINEERING, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.
ORDER REGARDING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS SEMPRA ENERGY AND SEMPRA LNG TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT [DocketNo.11]
Defendants Sempra Energy and Sempra LNG's Joint Motion to extend the time in which Defendants must respond to the complaint an additional 30 days and 24 days, respectively, to May 8, 2008 came regularly before this court and good cause for such continuance having been shown,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Sempra Energy and Sempra LNG are granted an additional 30 and 24 days, respectively, within which to respond to the Complaint, such responses being now due May 8, 2008.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.