Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Berger v. Seyfarth Shaw LLP

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


April 17, 2008

RICHARD W. BERGER AND BRANT W. BERGER, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP, AN ILLINOIS LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP; JACK L. SLOBODIN, AN INDIVIDUAL; BURNETT, BURNETT & ALLEN, A CALIFORNIA PARTNERSHIP; DOUGLAS B. ALLEN, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge

STIPULATED REQUEST TO RESET BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby make a stipulated request under Local Rule 6-2 that the briefing schedule for Plaintiffs' motions to dismiss Defendants' counterclaims be reset as follows: oppositions are due by May 15, 2008 and replies, if any, are due by June 6, 2008. Pursuant to Civil L. R. 6-2, this stipulated request is accompanied by the Declaration of Klaus H. Hamm.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: April 17, 2008 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP KLAUS H. HAMM Attorneys for Defendants

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP, and JACK L. SLOBODIN

Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X.B. regarding signatures, Klaus H. Hamm hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained.

Dated: April 17, 2008 BURNETT, BURNETT & ALLEN DOUGLAS B. ALLEN Attorneys for Defendants

DOUGLAS B. ALLEN and BURNETT, BURNETT & ALLEN Concurrence obtained per General Order

Dated: April 17, 2008 BECK, ROSS, BISMONTE & FINLEY, LLP CRAIG A. HANSEN Attorneys for Plaintiffs RICHARD W. BERGER and BRANT W. BERGER Concurrence obtained per General Order 45 X.B.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO ORDERED. The briefing schedule for Plaintiffs' motions to dismiss Defendants' counterclaims 4 is reset as follows: oppositions are due by May 15, 2008 and replies, if any, are due by June 6, 2008.

The stipulated request to alter the briefing schedule is denied without prejudice for failure to demonstrate good cause for the request.

20080417

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.