Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Twinde v. Threshold Pharmaceuticals

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION


April 18, 2008

JERRY TWINDE, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
RAYNOLD L. GILBERT, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THRESHOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Judge

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENDING THE PAGE LIMIT FOR BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

WHEREAS, lead plaintiff filed his Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws in this action on January 15, 2008, and defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Amended Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws ("Motion to Dismiss") on March 7, 2008;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, lead plaintiff is to have 25 pages to respond to defendants' Motion to Dismiss, due April 21, 2008, and defendants are to have 15 pages to reply, due May 29, 2008;

WHEREAS, lead plaintiff believes that because of the number and complexity of the issues raised in defendants' 25-page Motion to Dismiss, lead plaintiff will need an additional 10 pages to fully respond to all of defendants' arguments; and

WHEREAS, defendants have agreed to stipulate to an extension of the page limit for lead plaintiff's response to 35 pages, and, in turn, seeks a 5-page extension for their reply brief.

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED by lead plaintiff and defendants, through their respective counsel of record, that, subject to the Court's approval, lead plaintiff shall have 35 pages to respond to defendants' Motion to Dismiss and defendants shall have 20 pages for their reply brief.

DATED: April 14, 2008 COUGHLIN STOIA GELLER RUDMAN & ROBBINS LLP

DENNIS J. HERMAN DANIEL J. PFEFFERBAUM 100 Pine Street, Suite 2600 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

DATED: April 14, 2008 HELLER EHRMAN LLP LAURENCE WEISS 275 Middlefield Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: 650/324-7000 650/324-0638 (fax) Attorneys for Defendants

I, Daniel J. Pfefferbaum, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENDING THE PAGE LIMIT FOR BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Laurence A. Weiss has concurred in this filing.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, lead plaintiff shall have 35 pages to respond to defendants' Motion to Dismiss and defendants shall have 20 pages for their reply brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20080418

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.