Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Carleton v. 504 Gap
May 15, 2008
DAVID CARLETON, AN INDIVIDUAL, PLAINTIFF,
v.
504 GAP, INC. DISABILITY PLANS AND THE GAP, INC., IN ITS CAPACITY AS PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge
STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER RE ADR
The parties jointly submit the following Stipulation and Proposed Order, and respectfully present it for the Court's consideration and approval, removing this action from 3 referral to Alternative Dispute Resolution.
The parties stipulate as follows.
1. The parties, by and through their respective counsel, have met and conferred regarding the potential for settlement. The parties believe that further discussions will prove fruitful either to resolve the case by agreement, or to determine that the case must be submitted to the Court for trial and judgment. The parties believe, however, that the assistance of a neutral mediator is unlikely to be significantly helpful in this relatively straightforward case..
2. Accordingly, the parties respectfully suggest that Mediation in this case would likely not be an effective or efficient use of the Court's ADR resources. Therefore, the parties jointly request that the Court remove this action from referral to Alternative Dispute Resolution under the Court's ADR program.
Date: May 14, 2008 By______________________________
Ronald K. Alberts Attorneys for Defendants
BAUM & WEEMS by Julian M. Baum
Date: May 14, 2008 By______________________________
Julian M. Baum Attorneys for Plaintiff
DECLARATION RE CONCURRENCE OF ...