Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Carleton v. 504 Gap

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 15, 2008

DAVID CARLETON, AN INDIVIDUAL, PLAINTIFF,
v.
504 GAP, INC. DISABILITY PLANS AND THE GAP, INC., IN ITS CAPACITY AS PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER RE ADR

The parties jointly submit the following Stipulation and Proposed Order, and respectfully present it for the Court's consideration and approval, removing this action from 3 referral to Alternative Dispute Resolution.

STIPULATION

The parties stipulate as follows.

1. The parties, by and through their respective counsel, have met and conferred regarding the potential for settlement. The parties believe that further discussions will prove fruitful either to resolve the case by agreement, or to determine that the case must be submitted to the Court for trial and judgment. The parties believe, however, that the assistance of a neutral mediator is unlikely to be significantly helpful in this relatively straightforward case..

2. Accordingly, the parties respectfully suggest that Mediation in this case would likely not be an effective or efficient use of the Court's ADR resources. Therefore, the parties jointly request that the Court remove this action from referral to Alternative Dispute Resolution under the Court's ADR program.

GORDON & REES LLP

Date: May 14, 2008 By______________________________

Ronald K. Alberts Attorneys for Defendants

BAUM & WEEMS by Julian M. Baum

Date: May 14, 2008 By______________________________

Julian M. Baum Attorneys for Plaintiff

David Carleton

DECLARATION RE CONCURRENCE OF SIGNATORIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, N.D. CAL.

GENERAL ORDER

The undersigned ECF filer hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of the foregoing document has been obtained from each of the other signatories whose signature is indicated by the notation " /s/ [name of signatory]."

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated: May 14, 2008

Julian M. Baum

ORDER

The parties having stipulated as set forth above,

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: MAY ____, 2008

JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20080515

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.