UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 16, 2008
REBECCA VANHATTEM AND GENIA CASTILLO, INDIVIDUALLY, ON BEHALF OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, AND ON BEHALF OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC, PLAINTIFF(S),
UNITED MORTGAGE GROUP, INC., PARMINDER JOHAL, PETER JOHAL A/K/A/ PETR JOHAL, AND DOES 1-10 INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANT(S).
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hamilton Phyllis J. United States District Judge
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider)
The parties will select a mutually agreeable mediator.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.
9 other requested deadline
Dated: 05/15/2008 Matthew C. Helland Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: 05/15/2008 Margaret Gillespie Attorney for Defendant
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation."
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
9 Non-binding Arbitration
9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
9 Mediation 4 9 Private ADR Deadline for ADR session 4 9 90 days from the date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.