Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Vestevich v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


May 27, 2008

KATHLEEN VESTEVICH, PLAINTIFF,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: M. James Lorenz United States District Court Judge

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT

In this declaratory relief action, Plaintiff seeks to obtain a declaration that Medicare has no lien on the proceeds of a wrongful death settlement. Plaintiff settled her claims with two insurance companies following the death of her husband in a motor vehicle accident, and Medicare asserted a lien on the proceeds. Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend her complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) to add Michael O. Leavitt, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services ("Secretary"), as a party defendant. For the reasons which follow, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED.

Plaintiff filed her complaint on January 4, 2008. Defendant United States answered on March 17, 2008. In its answer, the government noted that the Secretary was the real party in interest in this action. (Answer at 1.) After unsuccessfully seeking the government's agreement to stipulate to amending the complaint to add the Secretary, Plaintiff moved for leave to amend on April 14, 2008. In its opposition, the government does not dispute that the Secretary is a proper party defendant, but instead seeks a dismissal of all the remaining defendants. The government also does not wish to waive its right to attack this court's authority to hear this case, claiming that Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies. The government does not argue that the amendment would be futile. See Cahill v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 80 F.3d 336, 339 (9th Cir. 1996).

Because leave to amend shall be freely given, see Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 15(a)(2), and the parties are in agreement that the Secretary is the real party in interest, Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend is GRANTED. To the extent the government seeks dismissal of the currently named Defendants, the relief is DENIED without prejudice. Any party requesting a ruling from the court must comply with Civil Local Rule 7.1, including obtaining a hearing date and filing a motion.

For the foregoing reasons IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend is GRANTED. No later than June 3, 2008, Plaintiff shall file and serve the first amended complaint. Defendants shall file and serve a response within the time provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3).

2. The government's request to dismiss the currently named Defendants is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to asserting it in an appropriate motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20080527

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.