Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Nygren v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


June 2, 2008

NATHAN NYGREN, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL THOSE SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Howard R. Lloyd

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PROPOSED SCHEDULE ON MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND SCHEDULE RE: SAME REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED BRIEFING

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties to the above-captioned matter, and by and between their undersigned counsel that:

1. On March 18, 2008, the parties filed a Joint Case Management Conference ("JCMS") with the Court.

2. The JCMS stated that the parties would submit a proposed Stipulated Protective Order to the Court by May 15, 2008.

3. On May 15, 2008, the parties requested, and were granted, a two-week extension of time (to May 29, 2008) so that they could continue to negotiate the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order.

4. The parties have further discussed the provisions of a proposed Protective Order and reached an impasse with respect to one provision of the document. The disagreement concerns whether the protective order should grant HP the right to object to Plaintiff's ability and right to use a testifying or consulting expert to whom Plaintiff will provide HP's "highly confidential" information. The parties have reached an agreement as to all other terms. At this time, and due to limited nature of the dispute, the parties have agreed, subject to Court approval, to an expedited briefing schedule as follows:

(a) HP will file a motion regarding this matter by June 19, 2008;

(b) Plaintiff Nathan Nygren's response to that motion will be due June 26, 2008; and

(c) A hearing, if the Court deems one necessary, will be held on July 1, 2008.

5. Neither parties' brief will exceed three pages.

6. The filer of this document attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained form the other signatory.

Dated: May 29, 2008

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Barry L. McCoy (pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendant HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

LEVY, RAM & OLSON EDELSON & ASSOCIATES, LLC SPECTOR, ROSEMAN & KODROFF, P.C Michael F. Ram Attorneys For Plaintiff

[PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THE STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (a) HP will file a motion regarding the protective order dispute by June 19, 2008; (b) Plaintiff Nathan Nygren will respond to that motion by June 26, 2008; and (c) a hearing, if the Court deems one necessary, will be held on July 1, 2008.

Honorable Howard R. Lloyd United States Magistrate Judge

20080602

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.