UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
June 9, 2008
VERIGY US, INC, A DELAWARE CORPORATION PLAINTIFF,
ROMI OMAR MAYDER, AN INDIVIDUAL; JUDGE: HONORABLE HOWARD R. LLOYD WESLEY MAYDER, AN INDIVIDUAL; SILICON CTRM: 2 TEST SYSTEMS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION;AND SILICON TEST SOLUTIONS, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION, COMPLAINT FILED: AUGUST 22, 2007 INCLUSIVE, TRIAL DATE: NONE SET DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Howard R. Lloyd United States Magistrate Court Judge
RE: HEARING FOR MOTION TO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER COMPEL STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HEARING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO COMPEL
and Defendants Romi Omar Mayder, an individual, Wesley Mayder, an individual, Silicon Test Systems, Inc. a California Corporation, and Silicon Test Solutions, LLC ("Defendants") by and 5 through their new counsel of record, Russo & Hale, LLP do hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
order for the Motion to Compel and plan on having at least one more in person meeting (if needed) to see if the dispute can be resolved through a such a stipulated order; and
hearing schedule, which postpones the hearing by one week:
2008, shall be heard on June 17, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. or as soon thereafter as the Court may hear the matter;
Plaintiff, Verigy US, Inc. ("Verigy"), by and through its counsel of record, Bergeson, LLP
WHEREAS, Russo & Hale, LLP has just substituted in as counsel for all Defendants; and
WHEREAS, counsel met last week in person and are currently working on a stipulated
WHEREAS the parties respectfully request court approval of the following modified
1. The hearing on Defendants' proposed motion to compel, currently set for June 10,
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
Dated: June 9, 2008 BERGESON, LLP Melinda M. Morton, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Verigy
Dated: June 9, 2008 RUSSO & HALE, LLP Jack Russo, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants Romi Mayder, Wesley Mayder, Silicon Test Systems, Inc. and Silicon Test Solutions, LLC
In accordance with the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and with good cause appearing therefor, the Court enters the Stipulation as an Order of the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.