Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Chanel, Inc. v. Pacini

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 12, 2008

CHANEL, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SUSAN LYNNE PACINI A/K/A SUSAN L. PACINI D/B/A PLANET TAN D/B/A MASTER MARKETEERS, INC., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Charles R. Breyer

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF CHANEL, INC. LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, plaintiff Chanel, Inc. ("Chanel") and defendants Susan L. Pacini and Master Marketeers, Inc., (collectively "Defendants") stipulate as follows and respectfully request that the Court enter the following Proposed Order:

WHEREAS on or about November 26, 2007, Chanel filed its original Complaint in this action naming Susan Pacini as the sole defendant, "doing business as" a variety of entities;

WHEREAS on December 24, 2007, defendant Susan Pacini was served; WHEREAS on April 7, 2008, Master Marketeers, Inc., filed an Answer to Chanel's Complaint;

WHEREAS Chanel's Complaint against Susan Pacini did not include Master Marketeers, Inc. as a named defendant;

WHEREAS, it is the position of defendants that Master Marketeers, Inc. was named as a defendant and an amendment is only needed to avoid any potential dispute in this regard;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Plaintiff may amend the Complaint to name Master Marketeers, Inc. as a defendant in this case;

WHEREAS, although Master Marketeers, Inc. has already answered, counsel for defendants is willing to stipulate to the filing of the First Amended Complaint on behalf of Chanel, Inc.;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT, subject to Court approval, Chanel shall file the First Amended Complaint naming Master Marketeers, Inc. as a defendant, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A; and

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT Defendants Pacini and Mass Marketers, Inc. shall have ten days from the filing of the First Amended Complaint within which to file their Answer(s).

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED,

Dated: June 11, 2008

KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP MICHAEL D. LISI Attorneys for Plaintiff CHANEL, INC.

TINGLEY PIOTKOWSK LLP BRUCE PIONTKOWSKI Attorney for Defendants SUSAN PACINI & MASTER MARKETEERS, INC.

I hereby attest that I have been authorized by Bruce Piontkowski to execute on his behalf this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Permitting Electronic/Computer Equipment into Federal Courtroom.

Executed on this 11th day of June, 2008, at San Francisco, California.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, Plaintiff is granted leave to amend its Complaint to add Master Marketeers, Inc. as a defendant to this litigation, as indicated in the First Amended Complaint attached to the parties' Stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Charles R. Breyer U.S. District Court Judge

20080612

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.