Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Northern California Watch v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


June 17, 2008

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA WATCH, A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, WEST COAST METALS, INC., AND DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Maxine M. Chesney

STIPULATION RE: EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

The parties hereto, by and through their counsel, Karin P. Beam of Spaulding McCullough & Tansil LLP for defendant West Coast Metals, Inc. and Jack Silver of Law Office of Jack Silver for plaintiff Northern California River Watch, do hereby stipulate and request this Court as follows:

1. The parties agree that defendant West Coast Metals, Inc. will have an additional week to respond to the Complaint, to and including June 23, 2008, so that during that intervening time potential matters can be addressed toward less costly resolution of the matter.

DATED: June 16, 2008

SPAULDING McCULLOUGH & TANSIL LLP Attorneys for Defendant WEST COAST METALS, INC. Karin P. Beam

DATED: June 16, 2008 LAW OFFICE OF JACK SILVER Attorney for Plaintiff NORTHERN CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH Jack Silver

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20080617

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.