IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 19, 2008
HERMINIA LORENZO CRUZ, PLAINTIFF,
INTERNATIONAL COLLECTION CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, AND CHARLES D. HENDRICKSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, DEFENDANTS.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs that any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5.)
Private ADR (please identify process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
other requested deadline
Dated: May 30, 2008
Fred W. Schwinn Attorney for Plaintiff
Larry Rothman Attorney for Defendants
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
Private ADR Deadline for ADR session
X 90 days from the date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.