Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Otay River Constructors v. Zurich American Insurance Co.

June 24, 2008

OTAY RIVER CONSTRUCTORS, A JOINT VENTURE OF THE WASHINGTON GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC., PLAINTIFF,
v.
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. William McCurine, Jr. U.S. Magistrate Judge

SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

On June 23, 2008, the Court held a telephonic Discovery Conference. Appearing for Plaintiff was Scott Sonne. Esq. Appearing for Defendant-in-Intervention was Gary Osborne, Esq. After consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties and being advised of the status of the case, and good cause appearing,

1. The parties shall disclose the identity of their respective experts in writing by September 29, 2008. The date for the disclosure of the identity of rebuttal experts shall be on or before October 13, 2008. The written designations shall include the name, address and telephone number of the expert and a reasonable summary of the testimony the expert is expected to provide. The list shall also include the normal rates the expert charges for deposition and trial testimony. The parties must identify any person who may be used at trial to present evidence pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702, 703 and 705, respectively. This requirement is not limited to retained experts.

2. On or before November 17, 2008, each party shall comply with the disclosure provisions in Rule 26(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This disclosure requirement applies to all persons retained or specifically employed to provide expert testimony or whose duties as an employee of the part regularly involve the giving of expert testimony.

3. Any party shall supplement its disclosure regarding contradictory or rebuttal evidence under Rule 26(a)(2)(c) on or before December 15, 2008.

4. Please be advised that failure to comply with this section or any other discovery order of the court may result in the sanctions provided for in Fed.R.Civ.P.37 including a prohibition on the introduction of experts or other designated matters in evidence.

5. All discovery, including experts, shall be completed by all parties on or before January 19, 2009. "Completed" means that all discovery under Rules 30-36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be initiated a sufficient period of time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off date, taking into account the times for service, notice and response as set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Counsel shall promptly and in good faith meet and confer with regard to all discovery disputes in compliance with Local Rule 26.1(a). All discovery motions shall be filed within 30 days after counsel have met and conferred and reached an impasse with regard to any particular discovery issue, but in no event shall discovery motions be filed more than 30 days after the close of discovery.

6. A Mandatory Settlement Conference shall be conducted on February 17, 2009 at 2:00 p.m. in the chambers of Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr. Counsel shall submit confidential settlement briefs directly to chambers no later than February 10, 2009. The briefs shall set forth the party's statement of the case and the party's settlement position, including the last offer or demand made by that party and a separate statement of the offer or demand the party is prepared to make at the Settlement Conference. Settlement Conference briefs shall not exceed ten (10) pages in length, and shall not include exhibits or attachments. All parties and claims adjusters for insured defendants and representatives with complete authority to enter into a binding settlement, as well as the principal attorney (s) responsible for the litigation, must be present and legally and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case at the Mandatory Settlement Conference. Any special arrangements desired in cases where settlement authority rests with a governing body shall be proposed in advance.

7. All other pretrial motions must be filed on or before March 3, 2009. (In intellectual property cases, this would include claims construction hearings. Motions will not be heard or calendared unless counsel for the moving party has obtained a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the judge who will hear the motion. Be further advised that the period of time between the date you request a motion date and the hearing date may be up to three or more months. Please plan accordingly. For example, you may have to contact the judge's law clerk three or more months in advance of the motion cutoff to calendar the motion. Failure to make a timely request a motion date may result in the motion not being heard. Motions will not be heard on the above date unless you have obtained that date from the judge's law clerk.

8. The requirements of Civil Local Rule 16.1 (f)(2) to file Memoranda of Contentions of Fact and Law are waived.

9. Counsel shall comply with the Pre-trial disclosure requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3) on or before May 4, 2009.

10. Counsel shall meet and confer on the preparation of the Pre-trial Order required by Judge Moskowitz on or before May 15, 2009.

The parties shall prepare a proposed Pre-trial Order containing the following:

(a) A statement to be read to the jury, not in excess of one page, of the nature of the case ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.