UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
June 30, 2008
UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFF,
RAMON BANUELOS-MARTINEZ, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Irma E. Gonzalez, Chief Judge United States District Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TRANSCRIPTS AND DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND DEFENDANT A COPY OF JUDGMENT
Defendant Ramon Banuelos-Martinez has filed a motion for the transcripts of his sentencing hearing. The Court denies this request because defendant does not fit within the statutory provisions authorizing free transcripts to indigent defendants. However, the Court will provide defendant with a copy of the judgment entered in his criminal case.
28 U.S.C. § 753 authorizes the United States to pay the court reporter's fees for a transcript furnished in criminal proceedings to persons proceeding under the Criminal Justice Act (18 U.S.C. 3006A), or in habeas corpus proceedings to individuals proceeding in forma pauperis. Defendant has not filed a habeas corpus petition. Defendant is also not entitled to a transcript pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, which permits reimbursement to attorneys for transcripts authorized by the Court and other "expenses reasonably incurred." 18 U.S.C. 3006A(d)(1).
Because there is no statutory authorization for granting defendant's request, defendant's motion is DENIED. Defendant's expressed concern is that the Bureau of Prisons does not know the correct length of his sentence. The judgment entered by the Court on May 31, 2007 noted defendant is committed to custody for 24 months. (Doc. No. 32.) The Clerk of the Court is directed to send defendant a copy of the judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.