Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Doe v. City of East Palo Alto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 17, 2008

JANE DOE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION; RAMI KHOURY, AND DOES 1-10 DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Howard R. Lloyd United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

STIPULATION AND ( XXXXXXXXX PROPOSED) ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINES

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-11, the parties file this stipulated motion to extend the ADR deadline in this case.

The parties have agreed to mediation of this matter through an ADR-appointed mediator. The parties have conferred with the Court's ADR division, which concurs with the parties request to extend the ADR deadline. No mediator has been appointed yet, and it is expected that a mediator will be appointed shortly. Discovery in the case is proceeding, and the parties will be ready to conduct mediation by an extended ADR deadline of September 15, 2008.

Dated: July 9, 2008

Ben Nisenbaum Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: July 9, 2008

JEFFREY M. VUCINICH, ESQ. PATRICK R. CO, ESQ. Attorney for Defendants CITY OF EAST PALO ALTO and OFFICER RAMI KHOURY

Pursuant to stipulation, the Court hereby orders that the deadline for the parties to complete ADR in this case be extended to September 15, 2008.

20080717

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.