UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
July 17, 2008
STMICROELECTRONICS, INC., PLAINTIFF,
ELIYAHOU HARARI; SANDISK CORPORATION; AND DOES 1 TO 20, INCLUSIVE. DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Jeremy Fogel United States District Judge
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
[ ] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[ ] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
[X] Private ADR (please identify process and provider): The parties are willing to participate in private mediation._______________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
[ ] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.
[X] other requested deadline: A date to be determined after resolution of the currently pending Motion to Remand.____________________________________________
Dated: July 14, 2008 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 18 19 By: /s/ Russell L. Johnson Russell L. Johnson Attorneys for Plaintiff
Dated: July 14, 2008 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 23 Professional Corporation By: /s/ Michael A. Ladra Michael A. Ladra Attorneys for Defendants ELIYAHOU HARARI and SANDISK CORPORATION
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
[ ] Non-binding Arbitration
[ ] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
[ ] Mediation
[X] Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session
[ ] 90 days from the date of this order.
[X] other: A date to be determined after resolution of the currently pending
Motion to Remand.__________________________________________
I, Michael A. Ladra, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file the STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Russell L. Johnson has concurred in this filing.
Dated: July 14, 2008 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation Michael A. Ladra
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.