UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
July 18, 2008
SUCCESSFACTORS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
SOFTSCAPE, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION; AND DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman
Date of Filing: April 28, 2008
Trial Date: June 1, 2009
Courtroom: G, 15th Floor
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY REFEREE
Plaintiff SuccessFactors, Inc. and Defendant Softscape, Inc., by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. The Court's July 7, 2008 Third Discovery Order (Docket No. 159) states that the "parties must agree to a discovery referee or each party must submit a list of five available discovery referees without conflict by July 18, 2008."
2. The parties are in the process of identifying and contacting discovery referees and require additional time to complete conflict checks and finalize their respective lists of available discovery referees or to agree on a stipulated referee.
3. The parties therefore request an order extending their deadline to either agree on a stipulated referee or submit lists of available discovery referees from July 18, 2008 to July 22, 2008.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: July 18, 2008
FENWICK & WEST LLP By: Laurence F. Pulgram Attorneys for Plaintiff SuccessFactors, Inc. AND POPEO, P.C. Bryan J. Sinclair Attorneys for Defendant Softscape, Inc.
Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.
Plaintiff SuccessFactors, Inc. and Defendant Softscape, Inc.'s Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Discovery Referee is hereby GRANTED. The July 18, 2008 deadline is hereby continued by two (2) court days. The parties must agree on a stipulated referee or each party must submit a list of five available discovery referees without conflict by July 22, 2008.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.