Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Pulse-Link Inc. v. Tzero Technologies

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 21, 2008

PULSE-LINK INCORPORATED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE TZERO TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED, DEFENDANT;

The opinion of the court was delivered by: M. James Lorenz United States District Court Judge

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO STAY LITIGATION PENDING INTER PARTES REEXAMINATION IN UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

And related counterclaims.

The parties filed a joint motion seeking to stay this action pending the United States Patent and Trademark Office's ("PTO") consideration of their petition for reexamination of United States Patent No. 6,970,448 ("'448 Patent") and, if the petition is granted, the reexamination of the '448 Patent. Because this case is in its early stages and because a reexamination is likely to simplify the issues before this court, the joint motion for stay is GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. All proceedings in this case, including discovery, are STAYED and all hearing dates set on the court's calendar are VACATED.

2. Because a reexamination can take up to two or more years, this case is TEMPORARILY CLOSED. Either party may file an ex parte application to reopen the case after either (a) the PTO denies Tzero Technologies, Incorporated's ("Tzero") request for reexamination of the '448 Patent; or (b) the PTO issues a reexamination certificate for the '448 Patent. The ex parte application shall be filed no later than thirty (30) calendar days after either event, and shall include a copy of the PTO's denial of the petition for reexamination or a copy of the reexamination certificate.

3. Upon reopening of the case, the parties shall comply with their respective outstanding discovery obligations and shall schedule a case management conference before the Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia to reset case management dates. Neither party shall argue that the passage of time due to the stay prejudiced them or that it justifies delaying resolution of this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20080721

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.