Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jarrett v. Intermune

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION


July 22, 2008

DEBORAH JANE JARRETT, NANCY ISENHOWER, AND JEFFREY H. FRANKEL, ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
INTERMUNE, INC., W. SCOTT HARKONEN, AND GENENTECH, INC., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Marilyn H. Patel United States District Court

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Trial Date: Not Set

Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, the Complaint in this action was filed on May 8, 2008;

WHEREAS, on June 30, 2008 Plaintiffs moved to relate to this case a civil action currently pending before the Hon. Vaughn R. Walker of this Court, Linda K. Rybkoski v. InterMune, Inc., et al., Case No. CV-08-2916 ("Rybkoski");

WHEREAS, a case management conference in this action is currently scheduled for August 11, 2008;

WHEREAS, certain counsel have scheduling conflicts on that date;

WHEREAS, counsel for all parties have agreed to accommodate those scheduling conflicts by agreeing to request that the case management conference be rescheduled to September 15, 2008;

WHEREAS, the existing deadline for responding to the complaint is August 25, 2008;

WHEREAS, Defendant Genentech, Inc. intends to file a motion to dismiss the Complaint in its entirety, and that motion must follow the case management conference;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff in the Rybkoski action and Defendants have agreed to request that the Court in Rybkoski extend the time in which Defendants shall have to respond to the Complaint in Rybkoski to September 22, 2008.

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate and request that the case management conference currently scheduled for August 11, 2008 be continued until September 15, 2008;

FURTHERMORE, Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate and request that the time in which Defendants shall have to respond to the Complaint filed herein be extended to, and 15 including, September 22, 2008.

DATED: July 18, 2008

COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLP

Jeffrey G. Knowles

Attorneys for Defendant GENENTECH, INC.

DATED: July 18, 2008

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO, LLP

Thomas M. Sobol Attorneys for Plaintiffs DEBORAH JANE JARRETT, NANCY ISENHOWER, AND JEFFREY H. FRANKEL

DATED: July 18, 2008

KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP

William M. Goodman Attorneys for Defendant W. SCOTT HARKONEN

DATED: July 18, 2008

COVINGTON & BURLING, LLP

Simon J. Frankel Attorneys for Defendant INTERMUNE, INC.

[Proposed] ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED

ATTESTATION

I, Jeffrey G. Knowles, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time for Defendant Genentech, Inc. to Respond to Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Thomas Sobol, William Goodman and Simon Frankel have concurred in this filing.

DATED: July 18, 2008

COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLP

Jeffrey G. Knowles

Attorneys for Defendant GENENTECH, INC.

20080722

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.