Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Bell v. Hartley

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 23, 2008

STEVEN D. BELL, PETITIONER,
v.
J. D. HARTLEY, WARDEN, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Thelton E. Henderson United States District Judge

ORDER OF TRANSFER

On July 7, 2008, Petitioner, a state prisoner incarcerated at Avenal State in Avenal, California, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging the California Board of Prison Terms' ("BPT") decision to deny him parole. Petitioner has paid the filing fee. Avenal State Prison is located within Fresno County, which lies within the Eastern District of California. See id. § 84(b). Venue is proper in a habeas action in either the district of conviction or the district of confinement, id. § 2241(d). However, the district of confinement is the preferable forum to review the execution of a sentence, including parole. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(a); Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989); cf. Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968) (district of conviction preferable forum to review conviction). Because the County of Fresno lies in the Eastern District of California, the Court orders that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and Habeas Local Rule 2254-3(b), and in the interest of justice, this petition be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.

The Clerk shall transfer this matter forthwith.

SO ORDERED.

20080723

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.