Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Fujitsu Ltd. v. Nanya Technology Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION


July 24, 2008

FUJITSU LIMITED AND FUJITSU MICROELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORP. AND NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORP. U.S.A. DEFENDANTS.
NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORP. AND NANYA TECHNOLOGY CORP. U.S.A., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,
v.
KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.
KLA-TENCOR CORPORATION, PLAINITFF,
v.
FUJITSU LIMITED AND FUJITSU MICROELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Judge

ORDER CONFIRMING DUE DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT [4:08- CV-01254 DKT NO. 16]

Having considered the Stipulated Request for an Order to Change the Due Date for Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Complaint, the court has determined the requested extension of time should not be granted. The Reply due date for Fujitsu's Motion to Dismiss Complaint is two weeks before the motion is heard to give the Court sufficient time to consider it.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

20080724

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.