Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ortiz-Flores v. McNeil-PPC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 25, 2008

ADRIAN ALEXANDER ORTIZ-FLORES, A MINOR BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN, TERRY ORTIZ; AND TERRY ORTIZ, AS AN INDIVIDUAL CONSUMER AND ON BEHALF OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MCNEIL-PPC, INC. A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Cathy Ann Bencivengo United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO FURTHER MODIFY DATES SET FORTH IN THE JANUARY 25, 2008 SCHEDULING ORDER [Doc. No. 46]

On July 8, 2008, the parties jointly requested [Doc. No. 46] that the Court continue the pre-trial dates set forth in the January 25, 2008 Scheduling Order [Doc. No. 21]. On July 24, 2008, the Court held a Mandatory Settlement Conference. The case did not settle so the Court addressed the request to continue dates. After consulting with counsel and considering the status of the case, and good cause appearing, the joint motion is GRANTED.

The plaintiffs' motion for class certification has been filed and, pending the outcome of that motion, all dates in the January 25, 2008 Scheduling Order [Doc. No. 21] are vacated. The parties shall contact the court within three days of the issuance of an order on the motion for class certification for a new Scheduling Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20080725

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.