Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Franklin v. Allstate Corp.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


July 30, 2008

LARELL FRANKLIN, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
ALLSTATE CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge

ORDER GRANLUND SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

By separate order filed this date, the Court approved the minor plaintiffs' compromise incident to plaintiffs' settlement of the action against the "RAS Defendants." Once the funds payable to said minors have been deposited, the only defendant remaining in the action will be Roy Granlund ("Granlund"), who has not appeared and against whom the Clerk entered default on March 17, 2008. Over four months has elapsed since plaintiffs obtained such default and no further action against Granlund has been taken by plaintiffs.

Accordingly, plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing, no later than August 15, 2008, why all claims against Granlund should not be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20080730

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.