Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Gremp v. Sonoma County
July 31, 2008
GREMP
v.
SONOMA COUNTY, ET AL.
GREMP
v.
LITTLE, ET AL.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge
An Administrative Motion has been filed, stating that the following cases may be related within the meaning of Civil L.R. 3-12:
On the basis of the material submitted to the Court, as the Judge assigned to the earliest filed case, I find that the cases:
[ ] ARE NOT RELATED as defined by Civil L.R. 3-12(a).
[ X ] ARE RELATED as defined by Civil L.R. 3-12(a). Counsel are instructed that all future filings in Gremp v. Little are to bear the initials MMC immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in the reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. Any date for hearing a noticed motion is vacated and must be re-noticed by the moving party before the undersigned; any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, except dates for any appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the undersigned.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw ...