Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

City of Fresno, California v. AIG Financial Products Corp.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 7, 2008

CITY OF FRESNO, CALIFORNIA,A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
AIG FINANCIAL PRODUCTS CORP.,ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Anthony W. Ishii Chief United States District Judge

DISCLOSURE

A judge has an affirmative duty to recuse himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. See 8 U.S.C. § 455; Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994). In some cases, it is unclear whether a judge has a conflict until the parties review both the specific facts of their case and the judge's personal circumstances. For this reason, the undersigned makes the following disclosure: The undersigned judge maintains current investment accounts with defendant Morgan Stanley. Because from the face of the complaint it does not appear that these investment accounts are directly related to the incidents underlying this action, the undersigned declines sua sponte to recuse himself from this case. However, leave to file a motion for recusal is given to any party who, after reviewing the facts of this particular case, believes that a recusal motion is appropriate. The undersigned judge is amenable to allowing limited disclosure of the nature and amounts of the investment accounts upon a filing of such a request with adequate safeguards for privacy and confidentiality concerns. IT IS SO ORDERED.

20080807

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.