IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 7, 2008
EVA D. AL-ZAGHARI, PETITIONER,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
Petitioner, a civil committee proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. This court will not rule on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis.
The proceedings against petitioner arose in San Mateo County and it appears that petitioner is confined in San Mateo County as well. San Mateo County is in an area embraced by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 2241(d), courts in both the district of commitment and the district of confinement have concurrent jurisdiction over applications for habeas corpus filed by state prisoners. Because petitioner was not convicted in this district, and is not presently confined here, this court does not have jurisdiction to entertain the application.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis;
2. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.