UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Northern District of California
August 12, 2008
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USM No: 93146011 Date of Previous Judgment: ) Rebecca Silbert (Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable) ) Defendant's Attorney
Order Regarding Motion or Stipulation for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
Upon motion of 9 the defendant 9 the Director of the Bureau of Prisons 9 the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion; or X Upon stipulation of the parties,
IT IS ORDERED that motion is:
9 DENIED. 9 GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of months is reduced to .
IT IS ORDERED that the stipulation is 9DISAPPROVED. APPROVED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of _____92_____ months is reduced to _84 mos._________.
I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE(Prior to Any Departures)
Previous Offense Level: JUDGMENT) Amended Offense Level: 24 Criminal History Category: VI Criminal History Category: VI Previous Guideline Range: 120 to 150 months Amended Guideline Range: 100 to 125 months 26 (PER 11/28/05
II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE
9 The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range. The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range. 9 Other (explain):
III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated 11/17/05 shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.