Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Dodson v. MAZ South Sacramento

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 12, 2008

ROBERT DODSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MAZ SOUTH SACRAMENTO, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

ORDER

Defendant Jamba Juice Company's ex parte application, filed August 8, 2008, does not provide "a satisfactory explanation for the need for issuance of [the requested order]" L.R. 6-144(e). Absent a showing of "need," the movant's request for relief will not handled on an expedited basis. The movant in essence argues its lawyer's failure to recognize the latest prescribed law and motion hearing date entitles it to have its motion receive expedited consideration. The movant is wrong; therefore, its ex parte application is denied.

20080812

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.