IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 12, 2008
ROBERT DODSON, PLAINTIFF,
MAZ SOUTH SACRAMENTO, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge
Defendant Jamba Juice Company's ex parte application, filed August 8, 2008, does not provide "a satisfactory explanation for the need for issuance of [the requested order]" L.R. 6-144(e). Absent a showing of "need," the movant's request for relief will not handled on an expedited basis. The movant in essence argues its lawyer's failure to recognize the latest prescribed law and motion hearing date entitles it to have its motion receive expedited consideration. The movant is wrong; therefore, its ex parte application is denied.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.