UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 13, 2008
MICHAEL J. HICKS, PLAINTIFF,
JOHN DOES 1 THRU 5, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (DOC. 10)
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE AND FORWARDING SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF FOR COMPLETION AND RETURN WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and is entitled to rely on the United States Marshal to effect service of process. Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 4(c). This action is proceeding on plaintiff's complaint, filed January 4, 2007, against five unidentified defendants for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On December 3, 2007, the court ordered plaintiff to provide any and all information that might help the United States Marshal identify and serve the unidentified defendants. On March 3, 2008, plaintiff filed a response to the court's order, identifying Correctional Officer J. Blackburn at CSP-Corcoran as one of the John Doe defendants. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: C/O J. BLACKBURN
2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff one (1) USM-285 form, one (1) summons, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed January 4, 2007.
3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the court with the following documents:
a. Completed summons;
b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and
c. Two (2) copies of the endorsed complaint filed January 4, 2007.
4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs.
5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.