UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 18, 2008
YUVAL LAPINER, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF,
CAMTEK, LTD., RAFI AMIT AND RONIT DULBERG, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AN EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE HIS AMENDED COMPLAINT
Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, and
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff shall have a two-week extension of time, up to and including August 22,2008, in which to file his Amended Complaint;
2. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to any amended consolidated complaint no later than October 6, 2008; If any defendant's
3. If Defendants' response to the Amended Complaint is a motion to dismiss, such motion shall be noticed for hearing no earlier than January 9, 2009, and Plaintiff shall file any opposition to the motion to dismiss no later than November 6, 2008; and
4. If such motion to dismiss is filed, defendants' reply in support of the motion to dismiss shall be filed no later than December 8, 2008.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.