UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 18, 2008
LYLE HUGHES, PLAINTIFF,
UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION; UNUM CORPORATION, NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Phyllis Hamilton United States District Judge
STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF and ORDER THEREON Courtroom 3 Floor 17 Hearing Date September 17, 2008 Time 9:00 a.m.
Defendants, Unum Group (formerly known as Unumprovident Corporation), First Unum Life Insurance Company (erroneously sued as Unum Corporation) and New York Life Insurance Company, with the Stipulation of counsel for the plaintiff, Lyle Hughes, submit this request for a extension of the time available to serve and file their Reply Brief in support of their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Docket No. 52) for a period ten (10) day, to Friday, August 22, 2008.
As grounds therefore, defendants state that this request for an extension is necessary because of an error in calendaring following the Court's continuance of the hearing date (Doc. No. 59).
Under the extension requested, the defendants' Reply Brief will be on file twenty-five (25) days before the hearing of the matter, and therefore defendants submit that this extension should not effect the Court's schedule for this case. No previous request for any extension has been made.
Therefore, with the assent of plaintiff, defendants hereby request that the time for filing their reply brief be extended to Friday, August 22, 2008.
Dated: August 14, 2008 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
THOMAS M. HERLIHY
LAWRENCE J. ROSE Attorneys for Defendants
UNUM GROUP (formerly known as UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION), FIRST UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (erroneously sued as UNUM CORPORATION) and NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Dated: August 15, 2008
BOURHIS & MANN
LAWRENCE MANN Attorneys for Plaintiff
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.