UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 19, 2008
JANETTA SCONIERS, PLAINTIFF,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
Plaintiff Janetta Sconiers ("Plaintiff"), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the instant application for appointment of counsel on July 31, 2008. Although Plaintiff's argument is mainly directed towards the pending motion to dismiss, she requests that the Court appoint counsel due to her medical and mental impairments. She contends that her impairments and medications make it difficult for her to litigate this action.
There is no Constitutional right to counsel in civil matters unless the indigent litigant is in danger of losing her physical liberty. Lassiter v. Dep't of Social Servs., 452 U.S. 18, 25 (1981). In certain exceptional circumstances, the Court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997). Without a reasonable method of securing and compensating counsel, this Court will seek volunteer counsel only in the most serious and exceptional cases.
In the present case, the Court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. See Rand, 113 F.3d at 1525. Despite her impairments, Plaintiff is able to articulate her claims sufficiently in this civil rights action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.