Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hill v. Williams

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 21, 2008

RICHARD ROSCOE HILL, PLAINTIFF,
v.
W.R. WILLIAMS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER GRANTING FIRST MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCUMENT #45)FORTY-FIVE DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 8, 2008, plaintiff filed a motion to extend time to file a response to the motion for summary judgment. Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Plaintiff is granted forty-five (45) days from the date of service of this order in which to file a response. Plaintiff may file a second motion to extend time at a later date if required. Plaintiff is reminded that no further extensions of time shall be granted without a showing of good cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20080821

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.