Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Cepeda v. Espinoza

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 21, 2008

DAVID DANIEL CEPEDA, PETITIONER,
v.
BRAD ESPINOZA, WARDEN, RESPONDENT.

ORDER

Petitioner is proceeding pro se. On August 1, 2008, petitioner filed a request for appointment of counsel on appeal, and a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. However, on August 11, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted respondent's motion for voluntary dismissal of the appeal. Accordingly, petitioner's August 1, 2008 filings are moot and will be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's August 1, 2008 request for the appointment of counsel on appeal is denied (docket no. 60); and

2. Petitioner's August 1, 2008 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied. (Docket No. 62.)

20080821

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.