IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
August 22, 2008
CARL MERTON IRONS, II, PETITIONER,
D.K. SISTO, WARDEN, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Judge
On January 3, 2008, respondent filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed December 18, 2007, granting petitioner's motion for leave to conduct discovery. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed December 18, 2007, is affirmed.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.