Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Enabnit v. Petsmart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


August 26, 2008

MAIDA ENABNIT, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF, ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND AS AN "AGGRIEVED EMPLOYEE" UNDER THE CALIFORNIA LABOR CODE PRIVATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT, PLAINTIFF,
v.
PETSMART, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION; AND DOES 1-50, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. John A. Mendez United States District Judge

ORDER REGARDING REQUEST FOR STAY OF ACTION

WHEREFORE, the parties have reached a settlement agreement to resolve the class claims in this case, subject to Court approval; and [Proposed] Order Regarding 1 Request for Stay of Action ted with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

WHEREFORE, the parties anticipate filing a motion for preliminary approval of the class settlement within 45 days of this order.

Good cause having been shown, the parties' joint request that all deadlines be stayed and upcoming hearing dates be taken off calendar pending the Court's ruling on the preliminary approval motion is hereby granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20080826

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.