Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Velarde

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 2, 2008

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DANIEL ADRIAN VELARDE, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: (honorable Lawrenc J. O'neill)

Date: October 10, 2008 Time: 9:00 AM

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MOTIONS HEARING; AND ORDER THEREON

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the motions hearing in the above-captioned matter now scheduled for September 5, 2008, may be continued to October 10, at 9:00 AM.

The grounds for the continuance are that Attorney Tom Dillon who is Mr. Velarde's immigration attorney is in trial in Fresno County Superior Court, Department 53 under case titled People of the State of California v. Richard Reynolds, et. al. (case number F08903327). It is anticipated that this trial may last 3 months. It is a multi-defendant case.

The undersigned has also been recently retained on a criminal matter in Sacramento Superior Court under case name People of the State of California v. James Jefferson, Jr. (case number 08F02389), trial has been set for September 2, 2008, however since counsel has just been retained, the matter has been reset for September 12, 2008 at 9:00 AM in Department 60 for trial setting.

The court has indicated that it expects the defense to be ready to go to trial within 60 days. In lieu of that counsel has been diligently preparing that case for trial. The discovery is voluminous and the potential witness list is extensive. For that reason counsel has dedicated any spare time to preparing that matter to go to trial within the time allotted by the court.

Based on the foregoing, the defense has not had enough time to resume plea negotiations with the prosecution in this matter. Counsel for the defense strongly believes that this matter can resolve with the appropriate negotiation.

The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice herein for effective defense preparation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(1)(F) and 3161(h)(8)(A).

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: August 29, 2008

MARIO DISALVO, Esq. Attorney for DANIEL ADRIAN VELARDE

MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney

Dated: August 29, 20008

Mark J. McKeon, Esq. Assistant US Attorney

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. Time is hereby excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(1)(F) and 3161(h)(8)(A).

Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill District Court Judge

20080902

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.