Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Russell v. Lattimore

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 8, 2008

TITENESHA RUSSELL, PETITIONER,
v.
MARY LATTIMORE, WARDEN, RESPONDENT.

ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By order filed August 1, 2008, petitioner's original petition was dismissed with leave to file an amended petition. Petitioner has now filed an amended petition.

Since petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to file an answer.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent is directed to file an answer within forty-five days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Respondent shall include with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application. Rule 5, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases;

2. Petitioner's traverse, if any, is due on or before thirty days from the date respondent's answer is filed;

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner's August 18, 2008 amended petition for writ of habeas corpus on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General.

20080908

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.