Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

White v. Carasco

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 11, 2008

BERNARD ANDREW WHITE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
M. CARASCO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: William M. Wunderlich United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER RE MOTION (DOC 9)

Plaintiff has filed a motion titled as a motion for the Magistrate Judge to acknowledge certain provisions of Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In the title of the motion, Plaintiff refers to "methods 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6." In his motion, Plaintiff seeks no specific relief from the court, and makes generalized, rambling, statements regarding prison life. Subsequently, Plaintiff filed a motion for injunctive relief. A recommendation has been entered regarding Plaintiff's motion. The court can not discern any grounds for relief which it can provide. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion filed on October 25, 2007, is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20080911

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.