IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
September 15, 2008
DAVID L. QUILL, PETITIONER,
GEORGE M. GALAZA, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge
On June 20, 2008, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner did not file a response. Accordingly, on August 6, 2008, the court ordered petitioner to show cause within twenty days why respondent's motion should not be granted.
On September 4, 2008, petitioner filed a pleading stating that he did not receive respondent's motion. This pleading also contains a new address for petitioner. Accordingly, respondent shall re-serve petitioner with the motion at his new address.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Within five days of the date of this order, respondent shall re-serve petitioner with the June 20, 2008, motion to dismiss at the address contained in petitioner's September 4, 2008, pleading; respondent shall file proof of re-service within that time;
2. Petitioner's response to respondent's motion to dismiss is due within thirty days of the date of this order.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.