Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Brooks v. Geo Group USA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


September 15, 2008

STEVEN BERNARD BROOKS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
GEO GROUP USA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT FROM THIS ACTION OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 20 DAYS (Doc. 15.)

Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA") and California law. On May 5, 2008, defendant Geo Group filed a motion to dismiss. (Doc. 15.) On September 8, 2008, plaintiff filed a statement that he has no opposition to the motion to dismiss filed by defendant Geo Group. (Doc. 31.)

Accordingly, plaintiff having conceded the argument and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:

1. The motion to dismiss, filed by defendant Geo Group on May 5, 2008, be GRANTED;

2. Defendant Geo Group be DISMISSED from this action; and

3. This action proceed only against defendant United States of America.

It is HEREBY ORDERED that these Findings and Recommendations be submitted to the United States District Court Judge assigned to the case pursuant to the provision of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Rule 72-304 of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court, Eastern District of California. Within TWENTY (20) days after being served with a copy of these Findings and Recommendation, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation." The court will then review the Magistrate Judge's ruling pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C).

The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the order of the District Court. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20080915

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.