Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Holtsinger v. Briddle

September 26, 2008

MICHAEL HOLTSINGER, PLAINTIFF,
v.
J.M. BRIDDLE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Craig M. Kellison United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding with appointed counsel, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant Voros successfully petitioned this court to set aside her default, and she has filed an answer. This matter proceeds as against defendant Voros only; all other defendants in this action have been dismissed.

As an answer to plaintiff's complaint has been filed, this case is now at issue, and is in need of a status conference. Accordingly, a status conference is hereby set before the undersigned on November 20, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. in Redding, California.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. All parties shall appear by counsel or in person if acting without counsel. Plaintiffs proceeding pro se must each appear at the status conference and are reminded that they may not make appearances for other plaintiffs proceeding pro se.

2. The parties shall submit to the court and serve by mail on all other parties, no later than seven (7) days before the Status (Pre-trial Scheduling) Conference, a status report addressing the following matters:

a. Service of process;

b. Possible joinder of additional parties;

c. Any expected or desired amendment of the pleadings;

d. Jurisdiction and venue;

e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;

f. The proposed discovery plan developed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f);

g. The potential for settlement and specific recommendations regarding settlement procedures and timing, including whether a settlement conference should be scheduled and if so when, and whether referral to the court's Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program (see Local Rule 16-271) is appropriate in this case;

h. Future proceedings, including setting appropriate cut-off dates for discovery and law and motion and the scheduling of ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.