UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 10, 2008
JANE ROE, PLAINTIFF,
CITY OF OAKLAND; RICHARD VALERGA; DOES 1-50, INCLUSIVE, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Claudia Wilken Judge of the United States District Court
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING FURTHER EXTENSION ON DEFENDANTS' TIME TO ANSWER THE COMPLAINT
WHEREAS, the parties have been engaging in good faith settlement discussions which have included the exchange of a written settlement demand by plaintiffs' counsel to defendants' counsel, an informal, in-person interview of the plaintiff by defendants' counsel and other good faith settlement discussions, and,
WHEREAS, defendants need additional time in which to obtain settlement authority from the City of Oakland City Council in order to respond to plaintiff's settlement demand,
THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD, DO HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE THAT defendants shall have an additional twenty-one (21) days in which to file an Answer to the plaintiff's Complaint while the parties continue to engage in good faith settlement discussions and defendants' counsel obtains settlement authority from the City of Oakland City Council.
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
Dated: October 29, 2008
JULIE M. HOUK Attorney for Plaintiff
WILLIAM SIMMONS Attorney for Defendant CITY OF OAKLAND
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.