Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Harrington v. Chase Home Finance

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 12, 2008

JOEL HARRINGTON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Barry Ted Moskowitz United States District Judge

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT MOTIONS TO DISMISS, MOTIONS FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT, AND MOTIONS TO STRIKE

Previously, Duxford Financial, Inc. ("Duxford") and Chase Home Finance LLC ("Chase") filed motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim, motions for a more definite statement, and motions to strike. After the motions were filed, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint, which does not name Duxford as a defendant. Due to the filing of the First Amended Complaint, the motions to dismiss, motions for a more definite statement, and motions to strike, all of which address the original complaint, are DENIED AS MOOT. Of course, this Order is without prejudice to Chase filing new motions in response to the First Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20081112

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.