Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Beecham v. City of West Sacramento

November 12, 2008

KARENE BEECHAM, INDIVIDUALLY, AND KARENA CRANKSON, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, A PUBLIC ENTITY, POLICE OFFICER TIMOTHY TWARDOSZ, POLICE OFFICER GEOFFREY ALBERT, POLICE OFFICER STEVE GODDEN, POLICE OFFICER ED HENSLEY, AND DOES 4 THROUGH 10, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, DEFENDANTS.



ORDER

On November 6, 2008, plaintiffs re-noticed a motion to compel discovery, and set the matter for hearing before this court on December 10, 2008. The motion seeks to compel further fact discovery, specifically, to compel defendants to produce documents responsive to Plaintiffs' Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Sets 4 and 5). However, the fact discovery deadline in this case closed on November 7, 2008, see Dckt. No. 51, and this court has no authority to consider a discovery motion after close of discovery.

Accordingly, the December 10, 2008, hearing on plaintiffs' discovery motion filed November 6, 2008 (Dckt. No. 109), is hereby VACATED.

SO ORDERED.

20081112

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.