Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lafaele v. Schwarzenegger

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 12, 2008

TOVIA LAFAELE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, DEFENDANT.

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 8, 2008, the court issued findings and recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed due to plaintiff's failure to state a cognizable claim.

On October 27, 2008, plaintiff filed a letter informing the court that his prison is on lockdown and that he would alert the court when the lockdown is lifted and he is ready to proceed with this action. Plaintiff is advised that he has a duty to diligently prosecute his case. In the interests of justice, however, the court will grant plaintiff a thirty-day extension of time to file objections, if any, to the court's findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order to file objections, if any, to the court's October 8, 2008 findings and recommendations.

20081112

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.