IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
November 12, 2008
HULEN T. HARRELL, PLAINTIFF,
P.D. PALMER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Judge
On October 21, 2008, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed October 10, 2008, striking plaintiff's second amended complaint and denying his request to supplement his opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's October 21, 2008 motion for reconsideration (Doc. No 31) is denied;
2. The order of the magistrate judge filed October 10, 2008, is affirmed.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.