Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Harrell v. Palmer

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


November 12, 2008

HULEN T. HARRELL, PLAINTIFF,
v.
P.D. PALMER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Judge

ORDER

On October 21, 2008, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed October 10, 2008, striking plaintiff's second amended complaint and denying his request to supplement his opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's October 21, 2008 motion for reconsideration (Doc. No 31) is denied;

2. The order of the magistrate judge filed October 10, 2008, is affirmed.

20081112

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.