The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L. Beck United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE, AND FORWARDING SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF FOR COMPLETION AND RETURN WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
Plaintiff Steven Palmer ("plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on January 26, 2007.
On July 15, 2008, Plaintiff filed a document entitled "Motion to amend first amendment complaint ordered by Judge Dennis L. Beck dated 4-28-08 United States Magistrate Judge". (Doc. 16). The document appears to be Plaintiff's second amended complaint, wherein Plaintiff alleges Eighth Amendment and state law tort claims arising from an allegation of excessive force, and from the medical treatment of his injuries. The Court has screened Plaintiff's second amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and finds that service is appropriate. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506, 512-15 (2002); Austin v. Terhune, 367 F.3d 1167, 1171 (9th Cir. 2004); Jackson v. Carey, 353 F.3d 750, 754 (9th Cir. 2003); Galbraith v. County of Santa Clara, 307 F.3d 1119, 1125-26 (9th Cir. 2002).
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: C/O CROTTY JOHN DOE, CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER AT CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION - TEHACHAPI
2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff two (2) USM-285 forms, two (2) summonses, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the second amended complaint filed July 15, 2008;
3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the court with the following documents:
b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and
c. Three (3) copies of the endorsed second amended complaint filed July 15, 2008.
4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs.
5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that ...