IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
December 19, 2008
MICHAEL VIGIL, PLAINTIFF,
AUTOZONE, INC., DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: John A. Mendez United States District Judge
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled actions. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).
On September 9, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 9, 2008, are adopted in full; and
2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.