Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kane v. Pierce

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


December 23, 2008

SHAUN KANE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
RICHARD PIERCE, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gary S. Austin United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT PIERCE (Doc. 55)

On September 16, 2008, Plaintiff Shaun Kane filed a motion seeking entry of default against Defendant Richard Pierce.

Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and where that fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Because Defendant Pierce neither waived service nor was personally served, he is not yet legally obligated to file a response to Plaintiff's amended complaint, and Plaintiff's motion seeking entry of default is HEREBY DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20081223

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.